Paris, France – As the world watches the 2024 Summer Olympics unfold in Paris, a broader conversation about the economic implications of hosting such a massive event has emerged. While the Olympics have long been celebrated as a global spectacle that brings nations together, they have also become synonymous with escalating costs and financial burdens for host cities. The Paris 2024 Olympics are no exception, and economists are increasingly questioning the sustainability of hosting the Games in their current form.
Aaron Favila/AP
According to a report by CNN, the economic impact of hosting the Olympics has become a topic of significant concern. The costs associated with building infrastructure, ensuring security, and providing services for athletes and spectators have skyrocketed in recent decades. “Hosting the Olympics has become a financially untenable proposition for many cities,” said Andrew Zimbalist, an economist who has studied the economic effects of the Olympics extensively. “The returns on investment are often much lower than expected, and the long-term benefits are questionable at best.”
The Paris 2024 Olympics are projected to cost billions of euros, with a significant portion of that budget allocated to infrastructure projects that will be used during the Games. However, as with many previous Olympics, there is a growing concern that these investments may not yield the anticipated economic benefits. Business Standard reported that one of the major challenges for host cities is controlling costs. “The budget for the Olympics often spirals out of control, as cities are pressured to meet the high standards set by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and to present a world-class event,” the report stated.
David Gray/AFP/Getty Images
The financial strain of hosting the Olympics has led to fewer cities bidding for the Games in recent years. A study highlighted on Hacker News pointed out that the economic risks are so high that many potential host cities have withdrawn their bids or declined to participate in the bidding process altogether. “All Games, without exception, have cost more than anticipated,” the study noted, adding that the economic burdens of hosting the Olympics can be likened to the storage of nuclear waste in terms of their long-term financial impact on host cities.
For Paris, the stakes are particularly high. The city is not only dealing with the logistical challenges of hosting millions of visitors but is also under pressure to justify the massive expenditures involved. The legacy of the Olympics—what remains after the Games are over—has become a critical issue for both organizers and residents. The potential for unused or underutilized infrastructure, commonly referred to as “white elephants,” looms large as a concern.
However, supporters of the Games argue that the Olympics can bring significant benefits, including increased tourism, global visibility, and the potential to revitalize urban areas. The Paris 2024 organizing committee has emphasized the importance of creating sustainable infrastructure that will serve the city long after the Games have ended. “We are committed to ensuring that the investments we make for the Olympics will have lasting value for Paris and its residents,” said Tony Estanguet, president of the Paris 2024 organizing committee, in a recent interview.
Yet, the question remains: Can the economic benefits of hosting the Olympics ever truly outweigh the costs? As Paris navigates the complex economic landscape of the 2024 Games, it does so with the knowledge that the financial risks are significant. The outcome of these Games may well shape the future of how—and where—the Olympics are held in the years to come.
